On the Question of Automating Passenger Aircraft

Both machines and humans are subject to error, breakdown and even potentially deadly malfunction, conditions that differ only in their manner and variety.  …Although, with humans, they tend to be, arguably, more difficult to hack, remotely hijack, or otherwise infect with decision-motivational viruses.

And, as always, humans will put a portion of their earnings back into the economy, whereas machines tend not to even earn a spendable income.

But I suppose even still, it’s a conversation whose time has come.

Perhaps we need to look at a resident AI with limited capability of only preventing the human pilots from setting the plane on a deliberately fatal course… something that cannot be switched off, except perhaps by a two-factor (both pilots) override.

Advertisements
Published in: on March 30, 2015 at 5:06 pm  Leave a Comment  
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s